You see this talk by sons of men in Nigeria could favor us who they call animals. I mean the talks about the ownership, non-ownersip and disownership of Lagos.
If the chauvinistic elements could have their way, it could pave some liberty for not only the fauna, but the flora as well. I mean those they import to Lagos from the north.
When they succeed in profiling people according to where they originally come from which I hear is against the dictates of Nigeria’s constitution, then we’ll fight for our animal rights.
When we do so, the fulcrum of argument will be if sons of men in Nigeria could win the right of the preservation of Lagos for Lagosians, why not the ones they call animals?
If we could sustain our narrative, there’ll be some liberty for us.
We won’t be exported to Lagos again. Since our owners do not eat much of our meat, we’ll enjoy greater longevity.
We’ll then be increasing and may even get to the point of overthrowing sons of men, who appear to be losing their reasoning faculty.
If not, would they be arguing about the ownership of land when the Bible says the earth belongs to God?
And these are people that will go to foreign lands and be claiming equality.
Adewale Sobowale.
030523
